           
Why Linux?
Glad you asked! Linux
is commonly known as a server operating system or an operating system
for advanced users. Can a non-pro use it, and why should he or she do
so?
While Linux did begin
its life as a server operating system and an
operating system for advanced users, Linux has made significant progress
in a most key area: its graphical user interface.
Linux now has a very
easy to use interface for both the Windows and Mac crowd. The desktop
looks, acts and feels incredibly familiar, as do applications such word
processors, spreadsheets and photo editors.
Here are a few reasons
to use Linux:
FUNCTIONALITY
Linux comes with many tools you normally must buy separately if you run
Windows or Mac, including a full featured office suite (amazingly similar
to Microsoft Office) and a complete software development kit that is comparable
to Visual C++.
STABILITY
Linux is a very stable operating system. Linux systems don't crash often,
and don't need to be rebooted for anything other than upgrading the operating
system itself.
(ALMOST) NO VIRUSES
Linux is not prone to viruses. Because of how Linux handles data, a virus
cannot overwrite system files or append itself to applications unless
you are working as the "root" user. Linux has no registry or
DLL files, so Windows viruses have no effect on Linux at all.
PRICE
Linux is available for download for free. You have the option of buying
Linux CD sets at a very low price. But the two or three core disks, with
thousands of applications and tools, are there for the taking. And these
are "crippled" versions. They have the same files as the CDs
in the store box.
OPEN SOURCE
Linux is completely Open Source, meaning programmers around the world
have access to its "source code", which is code programmers
can read and modify. While this may not affect you as an end user directly,
it affects you indirectly because this means that Linux and its tools
and apps are under continuous, shared development. And updates to the
operating system and all the other software is a snap.
INDEPENDENCE
If the maintainers of traditional proprietary software (such as Windows
or Microsoft Office) stop working on it, or choose to ignore your problems,
you're on your own. Nobody can help you. DOS users remember a great program
called Q&A. Once the company that developed Q&A went out of business,
another company bought this marvelous app and then let it die. If someone
stops maintaining a Linux software application, someone steps in and continues
the work. The software is not "company owned" and controlled,
and so won't become a Q&A.
SPEED of development
Due to the its open source nature, many programmers from all around the
world work on Linux, causing it to develop and mature much faster than
other software.
FLEXIBILITY
If you need a feature in an application (or the operating system itself),
you don't need to turn to the maker of the application to get it in -
any
programmer can do it for you!
|
Linux
News and Notes
What we've got here is failure-or
unwillingness-to communicate.
The SCO Group has spent the
past couple of months directing sensational
allegations and vague threats toward Linux (news - web sites) and any
individual or company that develops, markets or runs the operating
system-all without presenting a bit of evidence for its claims.
According to SCO, June was
to be "show and tell time," but we're halfway
through the month and have hardly any more facts than when this saga began.
SCO refuses to lay out its
cards without a nondisclosure agreement. However, the NDA it's offering
is worded so restrictively that anyone qualified to evaluate the evidence
could not see it to begin with. Even with a signed gag order, SCO has
severely limited the selections, amount and context of
information it is willing to show.
Those who have signed the NDA
have spoken of 80 lines of identical code
present in the Linux and SCO-owned code bases. Did these lines flow from
SCO
to Linux or from Linux to SCO? Or did both code bases inherit these lines
from a third, common source such as BSD? At this point, there's too little
information to make a judgment.
SCO has likened itself to the
recording industry and its quest to stop
unauthorized file trading. However, unlike the recording industry, SCO
refuses to point out where and how it's been violated.
If SCO's intellectual property
rights are being infringed upon, it's in
everyone's best interests to locate and eliminate the infringing code,
sort
out what damages (if any) are due SCO, and move forward under clear skies.
For now, the ball is in SCO's
court. If the company is truly serious about
preventing further infringement of its intellectual property, it's up
to SCO
to pick up the ball and run with it.
|
