D. L. Corbet & Associates
 

Commercial and Government Services.
The Right Way. The First Time.

Why Linux?

Glad you asked! Linux is commonly known as a server operating system or an operating system for advanced users. Can a non-pro use it, and why should he or she do so?

While Linux did begin its life as a server operating system and an
operating system for advanced users, Linux has made significant progress in a most key area: its graphical user interface.

Linux now has a very easy to use interface for both the Windows and Mac crowd. The desktop looks, acts and feels incredibly familiar, as do applications such word processors, spreadsheets and photo editors.

Here are a few reasons to use Linux:
FUNCTIONALITY
Linux comes with many tools you normally must buy separately if you run Windows or Mac, including a full featured office suite (amazingly similar to Microsoft Office) and a complete software development kit that is comparable to Visual C++.
STABILITY
Linux is a very stable operating system. Linux systems don't crash often, and don't need to be rebooted for anything other than upgrading the operating system itself.
(ALMOST) NO VIRUSES
Linux is not prone to viruses. Because of how Linux handles data, a virus cannot overwrite system files or append itself to applications unless you are working as the "root" user. Linux has no registry or DLL files, so Windows viruses have no effect on Linux at all.
PRICE
Linux is available for download for free. You have the option of buying Linux CD sets at a very low price. But the two or three core disks, with thousands of applications and tools, are there for the taking. And these are "crippled" versions. They have the same files as the CDs in the store box.
OPEN SOURCE
Linux is completely Open Source, meaning programmers around the world have access to its "source code", which is code programmers can read and modify. While this may not affect you as an end user directly, it affects you indirectly because this means that Linux and its tools and apps are under continuous, shared development. And updates to the operating system and all the other software is a snap.
INDEPENDENCE
If the maintainers of traditional proprietary software (such as Windows or Microsoft Office) stop working on it, or choose to ignore your problems, you're on your own. Nobody can help you. DOS users remember a great program called Q&A. Once the company that developed Q&A went out of business, another company bought this marvelous app and then let it die. If someone stops maintaining a Linux software application, someone steps in and continues the work. The software is not "company owned" and controlled, and so won't become a Q&A.
SPEED of development
Due to the its open source nature, many programmers from all around the world work on Linux, causing it to develop and mature much faster than other software.
FLEXIBILITY
If you need a feature in an application (or the operating system itself), you don't need to turn to the maker of the application to get it in - any
programmer can do it for you!

Linux News and Notes

From the FINANCIAL TIMES, June 4

Is the world's biggest software company facing a technology gap? Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of Microsoft, addressed that question directly Wednesday in a memo to the company's rank and file that laid out the challenges of the next two or three years in stark detail.

HIS MESSAGE: With no immediate breakthroughs in technology coming, and with the Linux computer operating system and a batch of other open-source programs biting at its heels, Microsoft will have to do a better job of
persuading customers it has something they need.

Some way off in the future lies a generation of technology that
Microsoft promises will change the lives of every computer user. Codenamed
Longhorn, it involves a complete revamp of the company's two core product
lines - the Windows operating system and Office productivity suite. It
promises to bring greater ease, reliability and security. In short, it will
be "the next quantum leap in computing, which will put us years ahead of any
other product on the market," wrote Ballmer.

When that day will come, however, noone is saying. In an interview, the
Microsoft CEO would only say that "Longhorn will come when we think it's
really ready." Some industry analysts have pencilled in 2005, but the company
is not prepared to endorse that view. Also, following its recent commitment
to delaying software releases until it has ironed out all the bugs - a marked
departure from the company's earlier practice - Microsoft seems more than
prepared to wait.

What, in the meantime, will business look like?

The picture painted on Wednesday by Ballmer is certainly a challenging
one. There is a general disenchantment with technology spending. Companies "have not yet seen a tangible return on dotcom investments." Add in the weak economy, and "there is less passion and enthusiasm for technology, and greater focus on doing more for less."

In that environment, companies have turned to Linux and other
open-source software programs, seeing them as cheap but adequate
alternatives. Around half of the 1 million corporate computers in the United
States that run the Unix operating system are candidates for migration to
Linux, according to Ballmer - a significant challenge to Microsoft, which has
set its own sights on winning over those customers for its Windows operating
system.

The Ballmer response: Microsoft will have to do a better job of
producing software whose benefits are clearly apparent to customers. And it
will have to do a better job, in particular, of gearing its development and
sales organizations to what its customers want. "There's a set of things I highlight that I want us to do better," says Ballmer in an interview.

These include redoubling its efforts to make its software more secure -
an initiative begun by Bill Gates early last year under the banner of
"trustworthy computing." Despite the headway made since then, Microsoft still
suffered the embarrassment of seeing some of its own computers succumb
earlier this year to the Slammer worm, a malicious bug that crippled
computers around the world.

"Our customers are still hit with security vulnerabilities and we have
spent a lot of time learning from Slammer what we need to do better," wrote
Ballmer in his memo to staff.

Equally importantly, Microsoft must "improve business consistency" so
that customers are not hit with unexpected - and unwanted - changes. That is
a lesson learned from last year, when the company's overhaul of its software
licensing terms antagonized many of its customers.

It must also get better at segmenting the markets its serves and turning out the products that different customers want. "Our ability to hear is quite good. We have to know how to respond," says Ballmer. To back up this new push to promote a more customer-friendly Microsoft, Ballmer promised that the company would "increase our advertising budget significantly for all our
audiences."

© The Financial Times Ltd 2003. "FT" and "Financial Times" are
trademarks of the Financial Times.


Copyright 2002
D. L. Corbet & Associates, LLC